Giants and Dinosaurs on the Earth

 

 

XXXX VVVVV  wrote:

 

You said:

I tell them that Noah had Dinosaurs on the Ark. I show them Proof in the Bible and show them Physical proof on the earth.

 

Dear Bro Jack Barr,

 

I have always had an interest about how dinosaurs fit into the book of Genesis. I didn't even know that Noah had them in his ark. I would like to know where I can find this in the book of Genesis. I know that it says something about Giants.

 

And also, I have been confused as to the creation spoken of in Ch. 1 of Genesis, where God creates man on the 6th day and how in Ch. 2 it is written that God created Adam out of the ground first, and then how He created the animals after Adam from out of the ground. And then, how God created Eve from out of his side.

 

IF you have time to explain this to me, Please teach me about these things. I have always found this interesting in the book of Genesis. I had always also believed that the "Sons of God" (Gen 6:4) who came into the women and created giants were also the fallen angels.

 

Please, I would like to hear your insight on these 2 subjects.

 

May God Bless You and take care,

Bro XXXXX

 

================================

 

 

godsword <godsword@barr-family.com> wrote:

Hi XXXXX,

So what about Giants on the Earth???  So what is the big deal????    There are also pygmies on the earth, and men and women no larger than 3-4 feet tall. 

There were Giants on the earth before the flood, but there is nothing to even suggest that Noah and none of his family were classed as Giants, so where did the Giants come from after the flood.  No one seems to care about that do they. All that they want to talk about is the Giants before the Flood, making them out to be some kind of Evil beings, or even the children of the Fallen Angels.  All of that is false.

Down throughout history there has always been Giants. I remember that as a young man that they showed on early TV a giant living at that time that was about 9 ft tall as I remember seeing. They compared him to a normal size man standing next to him. He had to have a special house built. And custom made suits.

Read the verse this way just the way that the bible gives it.

Ge. 6:4.  There were giants in the earth in those days;   (End of first statement)

And also after that  (There continued to be Giants on the earth - end of the statement)

How long after were there giants on the earth??? At least until the Flood. Then reappeared sometime after the Flood.

Then:

when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them.

who bore the children? Not the Giants.  It was the sons of God and the daughters of men who bore the children. 

That took time, for when you check down through the heredity lines, you see that the Giants, which were not mentioned again else ware, were there early on and continued to be on the earth for several hundreds of years, even to a thousand years before the flood, and that is all that the Bible says about those early giants. 

So the question, if there were no giants on the Ark, and all mankind was destroyed by the flood, then how did we again have entire races of Giants??  We know today that if two very large people have children, that most of them will be large also. But even large people can have a very small child of what we might call pygmy size, or dwarfs.  And a dwarf pair can produce a child of regular or extra large size. 

Now just for you, I pulled theses off of the internet, showing how we have always had Giants.  Just because they are giants does not make them supernatural nor does it make them fallen evil angels as some have claimed. Beware of what is claimed about them, for their claims comes from someone's weird idea that has no basis in truth. 

With the Love of Jesus
Jack Barr

Now information from the internet about the Giants down through history.

Giants throughout History

 

http://www.stevequayle.com/Giants/charts/charts.html

 

The following chart represents the comparative sizes of giants throughout history.

 

 

 

Text courtesy of Proving The Bible

 

 

Source for the above information:
Joe Taylor, Mt. Blanco Fossil Museum
124 West Main St., P.O. Box 550, Crosbyton, TX 79322
(805) 675-7777 (office) and (806) 675-2421 (fax)
http://www.mtblanco.com

 

=====================================================

 
http://www.returnofthenephilim.com/GiantBonesDiscoveries.html

 

Discoveries of Giant Human Bones

Giant Remains of the Nephilim

 
What Darwinian "Scientists" do not Want you to Know

 

Giant Skeletons
In his book, The Natural and Aboriginal History of Tennessee, author John Haywood describes "very large" bones in stone graves found in Williamson County, Tennessee, in 1821. In White County, Tennessee, an "ancient fortification" contained skeletons of gigantic stature averaging at least 7 feet in length.
 
 Giant skeletons were found in the mid-1800s near Rutland and Rodman, New York. J.N. DeHart, M.D. found vertebrae "larger than those of the present type" in Wisconsin mounds in 1876. W.H.R. Lykins uncovered skull bones "of great size and thickness" in mounds of Kansas City area in 1877.
 
 George W. Hill, M.D., dug out a skeleton "of unusual size" in a mound of Ashland County, Ohio. In 1879, a nine-foot, eight-inch skeleton was excavated from a mound near Brewersville, Indiana (Indianapolis News, Nov 10, 1975).
 
 A six foot, six inch skeleton was found in a Utah mound. This was at least a foot taller than the average Indian height in the area, and these natives — what few there were of them — were not mound builders.
 
"A skeleton which is reported to have been of enormous dimensions" was found in a clay coffin, with a sandstone slab containing hieroglyphics, during mound explorations by a Dr Everhart near Zanesville, Ohio. (American Antiquarian, v3, 1880, pg61).
 
 Ten skeletons "of both sexes and of gigantic size" were taken from a mound at Warren, Minnesota, 1883. (St. Paul Pioneer Press, May 23, 1883) A skeleton 7 feet 6 inches long was found in a massive stone structure that was likened to a temple chamber within a mound in Kanawha County, West Virginia, in 1884. (American Antiquarian, v6, 1884 133f. Cyrus Thomas, Report on Mound Explorations of the Bureau of Ethnology, 12th Annual Report, Smithsonian Bureau of Ethnology, 1890-91).
 
 A large mound near Gasterville, Pennsylvania, contained a vault in which was found a skeleton measuring 7 feet 2 inches. Inscriptions were carved on the vault. (American Antiquarian, v7, 1885, 52f).
 
 In 1885, miners discovered the mummified remains of woman measuring 6 feet 8 inches tall holding an infant. The mummies were found in a cave behind a wall of rock in the Yosemite Valley.
 
 In Minnesota, 1888, were discovered remains of seven skeletons 7 to 8 feet tall. (St. Paul Pioneer Press, June 29, 1888).
 
 A mound near Toledo, Ohio, held 20 skeletons, seated and facing east with jaws and teeth "twice as large as those of present day people," and besides each was a large bowl with "curiously wrought hieroglyphic figures." (Chicago Record, Oct. 24, 1895; cited by Ron G. Dobbins, NEARA Journal, v13, fall 1978).
 
 The skeleton of a huge man was uncovered at the Beckley farm, Lake Koronis, Minnesota; while at Moose Island and Pine City, bones of other giants came to light. (St. Paul Globe, Aug. 12, 1896).
 
In 1911, several red-haired mummies ranging from 6 and a half feet to 8 feet tall were discovered in a cave in Lovelock, Nevada.
 
 In February and June of 1931, large skeletons were found in the Humboldt lake bed near Lovelock, Nevada. The first of these two skeletons found measured 8 1/2 feet tall and appeared to have been wrapped in a gum-covered fabric similar to the Egyptian manner. The second skeleton was almost 10 feet long. (Review — Miner, June 19, 1931).
 
A 7 foot 7 inch skeleton was reported to have been found on the Friedman ranch, near Lovelock, Nevada, in 1939.(Review — Miner, Sept. 29, 1939) In 1965, a skeleton measuring 8 feet 9 inches was found buried under a rock ledge along the Holly Creek in east-central Kentucky.
 
Australian Giants
There was a race or group of people found in Australia called "meganthropus" by anthropologists. These people were of very large size — estimated between 7 to 12 feet tall, depending on what source you read. These people were found with mega tool artifacts, so their humanness is difficult to question. Four jaw fragments and thousands of teeth have been found in China of "gigantopithecus blacki" — named after the discover. Based on the size of the teeth and deep jaws, its size has been estimated at around 10 feet and as tall as 12 feet, 1200 pounds.
 

Proof Of Australian Giants
In old river gravels near Bathurst, NSW, huge stone artifacts — clubs, pounders, adzes, chisels, knives and hand axes -- all of tremendous weight, lie scattered over a wide area. These weigh anything from 8, 10, 15, to 21 and 25 pounds, implements which only men of tremendous proportions could possibly have made and used. Estimates for the actual size of these men range from 10 to 12 feet tall and over, weighing from 500 to 600 lbs. A fossicker searching the Winburndale River north of Bathurst discovered a large quartzitised fossil human molar tooth, far too big for any normal modern man. A similar find was made near Dubbo, N.S.W.
 
Prospectors working in the Bathurst district in the 1930's frequently reported coming across numerous large human footprints fossilized in shoals of red jasper.
 
Even more impressive were fossil deposits found by naturalist Rex Gilroy around Bathurst. He excavated from a depth of 6 feet (2 m) below the surface a fossil lower back molar tooth measuring 67 mm. in length by 50mm. x 42 mm. across the crown. If his measurements are correct, the owner would have been at least 25 ft. tall, weighing well over 1,000 lbs!
 
At Gympie, Queensland, a farmer, Keith Walker, was ploughing his field when he turned up the large fragment of the back portion of a jaw which still possessed the hollow for a missing lower back molar tooth. This is now in Rex GiIroy's possession. The owner of the tooth would have stood at 10 feet tall.
 
In the Megalong Valley in the Blue Mountains NSW, a Mr P. Holman found in ironstone protruding from a creek bank the deeply impressed print of a large human-like foot. The print was that of the instep, with all 5 toes clearly shown. This footprint measures 7 inches across the toes. Had the footprint been complete it would have been at least 2 feet (60 cm in length, appropriate to a 12 foot human. However, the largest footprint found on the Blue Mountains must have belonged to a man 20 feet tall!
 
A set of 3 huge footprints was discovered near Mulgoa, south of Penrith, N.S.W. These prints, each measuring 2 ft long and 7 inches across the toes, are 6 ft. apart, indicating the stride of the 12 ft. giant who left them. These prints were preserved by volcanic lava and ash flows which "occurred millions of years" before man is supposed to have appeared on the Australian continent (if one is to believe the evolutionary theory): Noel Reeves found monstrous footprints near Kempsey, N.S.W. in sandstone beds on the Upper Macleay River. One print shows toe 4 inches (10cm) long and the total toe-span is 10 inches (25cm) — suggesting that the owner of the print may have been 17 feet tall.
 
It is certain the Aborigines were not the first to reach Australia. Anthropologists maintain mainland Aborigines are in fact quite recent arrivals that ate their predecessors who were akin to the New Guinea natives. Aborigine themselves admit in their ancient folklore that this land was inhabited by several groups of men, as well as giants, before they settled here.
 
More Giant Records
In an old book entitled "History And Antiquities Of Allerdale," there is an account of a giant found in Cumberland, England, at an unknown date in the middle ages. Called "A True Report of Hugh Hodson, of Thorneway," it states: "The said giant was buried four yards deep in the ground, which is now a corn field. He was four yards and a half long, and was in complete armour; his sword and battle-axe lying by him....his teeth were six inches long, and two inches broad...." The bones of a twelve foot tall man were dug up in 1833 by a group of soldiers at Lompock Rancho, California. The skeleton was surrounded by giant weapons, and the skull featured a double row of teeth. Yet another giant was unearthed in 1891, when workmen in Crittenden, Arizona excavated a huge stone coffin that had evidently once held the body of a man 12 feet tall. A carving on the granite case indicated that he had six toes.
A living giant was sighted in the little village of Buffalo Mills, Pennsylvania, on August 19, 1973. A man at least nine feet tall strode down the main street of the village, dressed in strange clothing, which appeared to be made of some sort of shimmering material. He gazed at the startled townspeople in a dark, penetrating way and then loped off casually into oblivion.
 
Other Giant Evidences
In July, 1877, four prospectors were looking for gold and silver outcroppings in a desolate, hilly area near the head of Spring Valley, not far from Eureka, Nevada.
 
Scanning the rocks, one of the men spotted something peculiar projecting from a high ledge. Climbing up to get a better look, the prospector was surprised to find a human leg bone and knee cap sticking out of solid rock. He called to his companions, and together they dislodged the oddity with picks. Realizing they had a most unusual find, the men brought it into Eureka, where it was placed on display.
 
The stone in which the bones were embedded was a hard, dark red quartzite, and the bones themselves were almost black with carbonization — indicative of great age. When the surrounding stone was carefully chipped away, the specimen was found to be composed of a leg bone broken off four inches above the knee, the knee cap and joint, the lower leg bones, and the complete bones of the foot. Several medical doctors examined the remains, and were convinced that anatomically they had indeed once belonged to a human being, and a very modern-looking one.
 
But an intriguing aspect of the bones was their size: from knee to heel they measured 39 inches. Their owner in life had thus stood over 12 feet tall. Compounding the mystery further was the fact that the rock in which the bones were found was dated geologically to the era of the dinosaurs, the Jurassic — over 185 million years old. The local papers ran several stories on the marvelous find, and two museums sent investigators to see if any more of the skeleton could be located. Unfortunately, nothing else but the leg and foot existed in the rock." Strange Relics from the Depths of the Earth--Jochmans
 
http://www.ior.com/~kjc/pages/strange.htm
 
Even More Records Of Giants
In 1936 Larson Kohl, the German paleontologist and anthropologist, found the bones of gigantic men on the shore of Lake Elyasi in Central Africa. Other giant skeletons were later found in Hava, the Transvaal and China. The evidence for the existence of giants is incontrovertible. "A scientifically assured fact," says Dr. Louis Burkhalter.
 

1.   Large bones in stone graves in Williamson County and White County, Tennessee. Discovered in the early 1800s, the average stature of these giants was 7 feet tall.

2.   Giant skeletons found in the mid-1800s in New York state near Rutland and Rodman.

3.   In 1833, soldiers digging at Lompock Rancho, California, discovered a male skeleton 12 feet tall. The skeleton was surrounded by caved shells, stone axes, other artifacts. The skeleton had double rows of upper and lower teeth. Unfortunately, this body was secretly buried because the local Indians became upset about the remains.

4.   A giant skull and vertebrae found in Wisconsin and Kansas City.

5.   A giant found off the California Coast on Santa Rosa Island in the 1800s was distinguished by its double rows of teeth.

6.   A 9-foot, 8-inch skeleton was excavated from a mount near Brewersville, Indiana, in 1879.

7.   Skeletons of "enormous dimensions" were found in mounds near Zanesville, Ohio, and Warren, Minnesota, in the 1880s.

8.   In Clearwater Minnesota, the skeletons of seven giants were found in mounds. These had receding foreheads and complete double dentition.

9.   At Le Crescent, Wisconsin, mounds were found to contain giant bones. Five miles north near Dresbach, the bones of people over 8 feet tall were found.

10.  In 1888 seven skeletons ranging from seven to 8 feet tall were discovered.

11.  Near Toledo, Ohio, 20 skeletons were discovered with jaws and teeth "twice as large as those of present day people." The account also noted that odd hieroglyphics were found with the bodies.

12.  Miners in Lovelock Cave, California, discovered a very tall, red-haired mummy In 1911

13.  This mummy eventually went to a fraternal lodge where it was used for "initiation purposes."

14.  In 1931, skeletons from 8 ½ to 10 feet long were found in the Humbolt lake bed in California.

15.  In 1932, Ellis Wright found human tracks in the gypsum rock at White Sands, New Mexico His discovery was later backed up by Fred Arthur, Supervisor of the Lincoln National Park and others who reported that each footprint was 22 inches long and from 8 to 10 inches wide. They were certain the prints were human in origin due to the outline of the perfect prints coupled with a readily apparent instep.

16.  During World War II, author Ivan T. Sanderson tells of how his crew was bulldozing through sedimentary rock when it stumbled upon what appeared to be a graveyard. In it were crania that measured from 22 to 24 inches from base to crown nearly three times as large as an adult human skull. Had the creatures to whom these skulls belonged been properly proportioned, they undoubtedly would have been at least 12 feet tall or taller.

17.  In 1947 a local newspaper reported the discovery of nine-foot-tall skeletons by amateur archaeologists working in Death Valley.

18.  The archaeologists involved also claimed to have found what appeared to be the bones of tigers and dinosaurs with the human remains.

19.  The Catalina Islands, off California, are the home of dwarf mammoth bones that were once roasted in ancient fire pits. These were roasted and eaten by human-like creatures who were giants with double rows of teeth.

 
Giant Skulls Found
Ivan T. Sanderson, a well-known zoologist and frequent guest on Johnny Carson's TONIGHT SHOW in the 1960s (usually with an exotic animal with a pangolin or a lemur), once related a curious story about a letter he received regarding an engineer who was stationed on the Aleutian island of Shemya during World War II. While building an airstrip, his crew bulldozed a group of hills and discovered under several sedimentary layers what appeared to be human remains. The Alaskan mound was in fact a graveyard of gigantic human remains, consisting of crania and long leg bones. The crania measured from 22 to 24 inches from base to crown. Since an adult skull normally measures about eight inches from back to front, such a large crania would imply an immense size for a normally proportioned human. Furthermore, every skull was said to have been neatly trepanned (a process of cutting a hole in the upper portion of the skull).
In fact, the habit of flattening the skull of an infant and forcing it to grow in an elongated shape was a practice used by ancient Peruvians, the Mayas, and the Flathead Indians of Montana. Sanderson tried to gather further proof, eventually receiving a letter from another member of the unit who confirmed the report. The letters both indicated that the Smithsonian Institution had collected the remains, yet nothing else was heard. Sanderson seemed convinced that the Smithsonian Institution had received the bizarre relics, but wondered why they would not release the data. He asks, "...is it that these people cannot face rewriting all the textbooks?"
 
Giant Footprints
In South Africa, a giant footprint of a woman measuring over 4 feet long has been carbon dated at approximately 9 million years old. Pointing to the probability of this being a female human-like species' foot, proportionally the two-legged being would need to be some 30 feet tall! The local African people commonly refer to this as a highly revered and sacred site. Giants, twice the size of gorillas, were found in Java.
 
The petrified remains of a giant were found in South Africa. A well-known anthropologist declared that these remains showed that these man's ancestors must have been giants.
 
Giant Devils
Within an ancient burial mound near the town of Sayre in Bradford County, Pennsylvania, skeletons measuring approximately 7 feet in length were discovered in the 1800s. But the most remarkable feature of these tall skeletons was not their height, but the strange horn-like protrusions above the brow region on their skulls. It was estimated that they were buried around 1200 AD. According to some sources, the skeletons were sent to the "American Investigating Museum" in Philadelphia, and vanished.
 
Revised Articles
In Lampec-Rancho California, in 1833, soldiers discovered a skeleton 11' 9" long which was covered with boulders with an unidentified writing. A similar writing was unearthed on the isle of Santa Maria off the cost of Los Angeles. In July of 1887 in Eureka Nevada, a human leg was found measuring 38.9 inches form the knee to the heel. The man was over 11 foot tall. In Crittenton Arizona in 1891 a sarcophagus was uncovered containing a human 3 meters high and had 12 toes. More recently skeletons ranging from 2.8 meters to 3.12 meters were found by soviets in the Caucasus Mountains. In China skeletons 10 feet tall have been found. In the Philippines a giant human skeleton was found at gargation, Measuring 17 feet long. In the Eagle three Cole mine at Bear Creek Montana in 1920 two human molars were found three times larger than normal. In Braton Tennessee human footprints were found in solid rock 33 inches log and one foot wide. These also have six toes each. Tools found in Morocco are so large their users must have been at least 12 foot tall. Other Giants found around the world are: the Java giant, the south China giant, and the South Africa giant. (See The Timeless Earth p. 26)
 
In 1833,soldiers digging a pit for a powder magazine at Lompock Rancho, California, hacked their way through a layer of cemented gravel and came up with the skeleton of a giant man about twelve feet tall. The skeleton was surrounded by carved shells, huge stone axes, and blocks of porphyry covered with unintelligible symbols. The giant was also noteworthy in still another respect :He had a double row of teeth, both upper and lower. When the natives began to attach some religious significance to the find, authorities ordered the skeleton and all the artifacts secretly reburied — and , of course ,lost to the scientific study they deserved.
 
This particular giant, incidentally, bore marked similarity to another, that of a giant man with double rows of teeth whose skeletal remains were dug up on Santa Rosa Island, off the California coast. Subsequent research has shown that he, or his descendants, feasted on the small elephants which once lived on that island and which have vanished like the giants who ate them, countless ages ago.
 
Near Crittenden, Arizona, in 1891, workmen excavating for a commercial building came upon a huge stone sarcophagus eight feet below the surface. The contractor called in expert help, and the sarcophagus was opened to reveal a granite mummy case which had once held the body of a human being more than twelve feet tall -a human with six toes, according to the carving of the case. But the body had been buried so many thousands of years that it had long since turned to dust. Just another silent witness to the truth of Genesis, which tells us that there were giants in the earth in those days, the excavation of over a dozen skeletons 8 to 12 feet tall, around the world, shocked archaeologists.
 
These skeletons were positively human. Some of these skeletal remains are on Maui in lava caves near Ulupalakua and Olowalu. An example of this is the "mysterious" disappearance of more than 50 perfectly kept gigantic antediluvian skeletons (between 10-14 feet tall) found in a cave in Arizona.
 
Earth Giants : over the years a number of gigantic human skeletons have been unearthed. The most distinctive of these were the remains of some American giants found in the 1880s at Tioga Point, near Sayre in Bradford County, Pennsylvania, as recounted by Robert Lyman in Forbidden Land. Some other examples include the following:
 
A decayed human skeleton claimed by eyewitnesses to measure around 3.28 meters (10 feet 9 inches tall), was unearthed by laborers while ploughing a vineyard in November 1856 in East Wheeling, now in West Virginia.
 
A human skeleton measuring 3.6 meters (12 foot) tall was unearthed at Lompock Rancho, California, in 1833 by soldiers digging in a pit for a powder magazine. The specimen had a double row of teeth and was surrounded by numerous stone axes, carved shells and porphyry blocks with abstruse symbols associated with it.
 
Several mummified remains of red haired humans ranging from 2-2.5 meters (6.5 feet to over 8 feet) tall were dug up at Lovelock Cave, (70 miles) north-east of Reno, Nevada, by a guano mining operation. These bones substantiated legends by the local Piute Indians regarding giants which they called Si-Te-Cahs. For some reason scientists did not seem to want to investigate these finds further so many of the bones were lost. Fortunately one of the giant Lovelock skulls is still preserved today. It measures almost 30cm (1 foot) tall and resides along with other various Lovelock artefacts in the Humboldt Museum in Winnemucca, Nevada. Some of these artefacts can also be found in the Nevada State Historical Society's museum at Reno.
 
The Hubbard Discovery
In this magazine for September, 1923, we mentioned a reported discovery by Mr. Samuel Hubbard, of remains of giants in the Grand Canyon of Arizona. Owing to press unreliability, we did not notice this to a great extent. We have now, however, obtained more knowledge on the subject, and there remains no doubt that Mr. Hubbard has actually made a discovery composed of the following parts:
 

1.   Petrified bodies of two human beings about 18 and 15 feet in height respectively. One of these is buried under a recent rock fall which would require several days' work to remove; the other, of which Mr. Hubbard took photographs, is in a crevice of difficult accessibility. The bodies are formed of a limestone petrification embedded in sandstone.

2.   An ancient beach, now sandstone, containing a great number of footprints of a giant race, men, women and children; the prints of adults about 17 to 20 inches in length, and corresponding in size and shape to the Carson City and Blue Ridge prints.

 
Even More Giant Records
According to a press clipping, dated Nayarit, Mexico, May 14, 1926, Capts. D. W. Page and F. W. Devalda discovered the bones of a race of giants who averaged over ten feet in height. Local legends state that they came from Ecuador. Nothing more has been heard of this, but that is not surprising; the word "giant" will flutter the feathers of any scientist into rapid flight, metaphorically speaking, in the opposite direction.

 So also with a report from the Washington Post, June 22, 1925, and the New York Herald-Tribune, June 21, 1925. A mining party, it is reported, found skeletons measuring 10 to 12 feet, with feet 18 to 20 inches long, near Sisoguiche, Mexico. The Los Angeles Times, October 2, 1927, says that explorers in Mexico located large human bones near Tapextla, indicating a race of "gigantic size." All this, if unfounded, would be straining coincidence or imagination pretty far.
 
Press accounts say that the skeleton of a gigantic man, with head missing, has been unearthed at El Boquin, on the Mico River, in the Chontales district. The ribs are a yard long and four inches wide and the shin bone is too heavy for one man to carry. "Chontales" is an Indian word, meaning "wild men."

In the late 1950's during road construction in Homs southeast Turkey, Many tombs of Giants were indeed unearthed. These tombs were 4 meters long, and when entered in 2 cases the human thigh bones were measured to be 47.24 inches in length. They calculated that the person who owned this Femur probably stood at fourteen to sixteen feet tall. A cast of this bone is seen at the Creationist museum in Texas.
Flavius Josephus, the noted Jewish historian of the first century A.D., described the giants as having "bodies so large and countenances so entirely different from other men that they were surprising to the sight and terrible to the hearing." And he adds that in his day, the bones of the giants were still on display!
 
A Pertinent Note
I know that some of these news and articles might sound somewhat far fetched, but as far as I know they are true.  The media, in general, takes the supernatural or conspiratorial off the public eyes.  Remember, the enemies of the Almighty claim the same concerning the realities described in the Bible.  The fact that something sounds strange, even weird, does not mean that it is necessarily unreal.  After all, we are in the End Times and things will get even stranger and much more distasteful before the Messiah returns to end it all as we know it, and then start a new, perfect and beautiful world.  What a wonderful Day that will be! I pray that you all are able to discern in these alternative news and articles the actual fulfillment of many prophecies which multiple generations of believers longed for the honor to see and live.
 
  ==============================================

XXXX VVVV wrote:

Dear Jack,

 

I never thought about Noah placing eggs of dinosaurs or little babies in the ark before! But now I believe that it makes some sense! Because we cannot deny the truth about the fossils that have been found concerning dinosaurs.

 

And the article about the Sons of God, It makes some sense, but how do you explain the other part about the "Giants" that were there. The ones that are here --> 4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
 

I always believed that Jude wrote about these angels in this verse: Jude 1:6

 

 

 6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

 

All this is interesting and new to me, Praised be God, i never looked at all these things before. I look forward to talking about this with my non-believing friends

 

GOD BLESS YOU, Jack

-XXXXXX

godsword <godsword@barr-family.com> wrote:

Hi XXXXX,

Oh yes, the physical proofs on the earth that Dinosaurs have been living on the earth as late as 1000 years ago.  And if there were any Dinosaurs on the earth after the Flood, then there had to be some on the Ark. 

I do not know why everyone assumes that all the animals on the Ark were full grown.  I would believe that virtually all the animals would have been young ones, still small and would come to maturity after they left the Ark so that they would live long and repopulate the Earth.  The Dinosaur is a reptile, and all reptiles continue to grow in size until the time of their death.  Most Dinosaurs start out as small as your hand, hatched out of eggs. 

For much detailed information go to http://www.bible.ca/tracks/  then follow the links to see about Human and Dinosaur footprints together, and Dinosaur Art in Peru and Mexico, and drawings on rocks in America, Then see the Human and Dinosaur fossils, and much more.

This site will start you on your quest for more information. In Peru they make blankets and cloths with figures of Dinosaurs woven in, and have for thousands of years. Where did they see the Dinosaurs in order to make copies of them. And in Mexico where they found clay figures of different kinds of Dinosaurs even with men playing with the Dinosaurs.  The Pictographs on the rock walls here in America where it showed men and Dinosaurs together and one of these places they know was done about 1000 years ago.

They do not look on Crocodiles and Alligators as being Descendent  from the Dinosaurs, or the Elephants and Rhinoeros. 

Now about Genesis chapter one and two.  There is a writing style here which is still in use today.

Example. Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth."   This is a clear and short statement that says it all. 

I can equate this writing style to my saying that I made a Table.  That statement would stand all by itself, for it says what I did. And that is what Genesis 1:1 does, it makes a statement of what God did.

Next, the rest of Genesis chapter one, goes on to tell HOW God made the heaven and the Earth, as well as all the animals and creatures on the earth.

That would be like my explaining How I made the table.  That I went into the woods and cut down a tree, then cut the tree up into boards which I then made all the  parts of the table and put them all together.

Then in Chapter 2 of Genesis, God then gives us more information, more detail,  of how he did some of the things which he told us about in chapter one. God jumps back to now explain How he did what he just told you.

It is like I could now tell you in much more detail how I made, and how I shaped, the different parts of the table. Like how I cut out the part for the legs, making them first square and long, then how I changed the shape to form a fancy shape of the legs. And I could then tell you how I attached those legs to the top of the table.

You see, This is a normal progression of describing not only what I did, but also How I did it.  And this type of story progression is common yet today.  Actually, I could have first told you all the details, then after telling you the details of how I cut and fitted all of the table together, I could then have said, "I made a table"  just as God said "I made the heavens and the earth".   For that statement fits in just as well at the end of telling you about  how the making of the heaven and earth was done, or the table,  as it did at the start of telling you.

Have I cleared that up for you, or have I just confused you more??

Now the sons of God, were not, and never were the fallen angels.  For Jesus told us that the Angels do not mate, do not produce children angels.  And that after we go to heaven, that none of us will mate or produce children either, for we will be like the Angels.

Now with that statement from God in our mind, we can then see that according to the bible, The lines of men diverged into two main streams. The Evil line of Cain and his Descendents, and the Godly line of Seth and his Descendents.

Now one more thing which God tells us. For God tells us exactly Who is a Son of God. 

Romans 8:4 where it says "For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God."

Now that very definition eliminates the fallen angels who rebelled against God because they are not, and cannot be, led by the Spirit of God, it also eliminates the sinfull line of Cain who would not obey God. .

So it is only the Godly line of Seth who is being led by the Spirit of God who is the Sons of God in Gen. 6:4   

For more details, see http://www.barr-family.com/godsword/claim3.htm  

With the Love of Jesus
Jack Barr